ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING OC 6G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
-VS-
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING OC 6G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GA104-200-A1 GPU Chip TU116-300-A1
38 Execution units 22
4864 Shader 1408
80 Render Output Units 48
152 Texture Units 88
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.410 GHz Base Clock 1.530 GHz
1.695 GHz Boost Clock 1.860 GHz
1.67 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.79 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
200 W TDP 125 W
220 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 3 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
36 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 3
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
269 mm Length 280 mm
136 mm Height 117 mm
52 mm Width 40 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-RTX3060TI-8G Part-no GV-N166SGAMING OC-6GD
Q4/2020 Release date Q4/2019
459 $ Release price --
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC
6. Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
7. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
10. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
11. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Advanced ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Advanced vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
13. MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER VENTUS OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER VENTUS OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060
15. AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
16. Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo
18. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070
19. EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
20. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
21. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT Challenger D 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT Challenger D 8G OC
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer White (1-Click OC) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer White (1-Click OC)


back to index
Facebook
Twitter