ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
-VS-
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GA104-300-A1 GPU Chip GA106-300-A1
46 Execution units 28
5888 Shader 3584
96 Render Output Units 64
184 Texture Units 112
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.875 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 360 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.320 GHz
1.845 GHz Boost Clock 1.882 GHz
1.82 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.85 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
220 W TDP 170 W
250 W TDP (up) 180 W
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 95 mm Fan 1 3 x 95 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
44-45 dB Noise (Load) 33 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
300 mm Length 301 mm
127 mm Height 143 mm
52 mm Width 54 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
TUF-RTX3070-O8G-GAMING Part-no TUF-RTX3060-O12G-GAMING
Q4/2020 Release date Q1/2021
759 $ Release price 529 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
2. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
4. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G
5. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
6. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming
7. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
8. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
10. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA
11. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G OC
13. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming
14. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC
15. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 XC GAMING ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 XC GAMING
16. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming Trio 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming Trio 8G
17. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 iChiLL X3 RED ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 iChiLL X3 RED vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
18. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
19. Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
20. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
21. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
22. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
23. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 Advanced ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 Advanced
24. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC
25. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo


back to index
Facebook
Twitter