ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
-VS-
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GA102-200-K1-A1 GPU Chip TU102
68 Execution units 68
8704 Shader 4352
96 Render Output Units 88
272 Texture Units 272
Memory
10 GB Memory Size 11 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6
1.188 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
760 GB/s Memory Bandwith 616 GB/s
320 bit Memory Interface 352 bit
Clock Speeds
1.440 GHz Base Clock 1.350 GHz
1.815 GHz Boost Clock 1.695 GHz
1.79 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.55 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
340 W TDP 250 W
375 W TDP (up) 320 W
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 85 mm Fan 1 3 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
36-45 dB Noise (Load) 40 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 3x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports 1
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
300 mm Length 290 mm
127 mm Height 134 mm
52 mm Width 60 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
1390 g Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
TUF-RTX3080-O10G-GAMING Part-no GV-N208TAORUS-11GC
Q3/2020 Release date Q3/2018
779 $ Release price 1,669 $
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
2. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 White ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 White
3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
4. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080
5. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
6. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
7. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO 10G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO 10G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
8. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 MASTER 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 MASTER 24G
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC
10. EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA GAMING ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA GAMING vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
11. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER OC
13. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
14. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING TRIO 10G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING TRIO 10G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
15. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim 24G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
16. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
17. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
18. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming
19. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
20. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC
21. ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Taichi X 16G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Taichi X 16G OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
22. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC MANLI GeForce RTX 3090 Gallardo (M3478) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs MANLI GeForce RTX 3090 Gallardo (M3478)
23. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER WINDFORCE 3X 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER WINDFORCE 3X 8G
24. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Xtreme 11G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Xtreme 11G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G
25. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter