EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming vs. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080

GPU comparison with benchmarks

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming
-VS-
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GA102-200-K1-A1 GPU Chip GA102-200-K1-A1
68 Execution units 68
8704 Shader 8704
96 Render Output Units 96
272 Texture Units 272
Memory
10 GB Memory Size 10 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6X
1.188 GHz Memory Speed 1.188 GHz
760 GB/s Memory Bandwith 760 GB/s
320 bit Memory Interface 320 bit
Clock Speeds
1.440 GHz Base Clock 1.440 GHz
1.755 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 3 % Boost Clock 1.740 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
Avg (Game) Clock 1.71 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
320 W TDP 340 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 6 %
370 W TDP (up) 375 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 1 %
93 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 90 mm Fan 1 3 x 85 mm
2 x 120 mm Fan 2 --
AIO water cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
41 dB Noise (Load) 36-45 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
263 mm Length 300 mm
112 mm Height 127 mm
-- Width 52 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 1390 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
10G-P5-3888-KR Part-no TUF-RTX3080-10G-GAMING
Q4/2020 Release date Q3/2020
869 $ Release price 779 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
2. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC
3. EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
4. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL X3 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL X3 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
5. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity OC
6. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
7. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle OC 10G EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle OC 10G vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming
8. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
10. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
11. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom GS ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom GS
13. EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Aero ITX 8G OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Aero ITX 8G OC
14. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
15. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
16. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming
17. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming
18. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC
19. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
20. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) Black ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) Black
21. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) V2 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) V2
22. EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER XC ULTRA GAMING EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER XC ULTRA GAMING vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming
23. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
24. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X
25. Manli GeForce RTX 2060 Gallardo (M2435) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Manli GeForce RTX 2060 Gallardo (M2435) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080


back to index
Facebook
Twitter