Gainward GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Gainward GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GP106-300-A1 GPU Chip TU116-300-A1
9 Execution units 22
1152 Shader 1408
48 Render Output Units 48
72 Texture Units 88
Memory
3 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR5 Memory Type GDDR6
2.002 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
192 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.506 GHz Base Clock 1.530 GHz
1.708 GHz Boost Clock 1.815 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.79 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
120 W TDP 125 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 3
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4 DP Ports 1x DP v1.4
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_1 DirectX 12_1
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
No VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
252 mm Length 242 mm
112 mm Height 130 mm
-- Width 53 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
426018336-3798 Part-no DUAL-GTX1660S-6G-EVO
Q3/2016 Release date Q4/2019
-- Release price --
16 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
2. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
3. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GP ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GP
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
5. XFX Radeon RX 5500 XT Thicc II Pro ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO XFX Radeon RX 5500 XT Thicc II Pro vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
6. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO AMD Radeon Pro VII ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs AMD Radeon Pro VII
7. ASRock Radeon RX 5600 XT Challenger D 6G OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASRock Radeon RX 5600 XT Challenger D 6G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
8. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 56 Red Dragon ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 56 Red Dragon
9. GALAX GeForce RTX 3060 (1-Click OC) ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO GALAX GeForce RTX 3060 (1-Click OC) vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
10. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660
11. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070
12. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060
13. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G
14. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
15. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
16. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
17. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO
18. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual
19. MSI GeForce RTX 2070 VENTUS 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO MSI GeForce RTX 2070 VENTUS 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
20. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC
21. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 590 Gaming 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO GIGABYTE Radeon RX 590 Gaming 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
22. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO
23. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC
24. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
25. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W


back to index
Facebook
Twitter