GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G vs. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G
-VS-
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GA102-200-K1-A1 GPU Chip GA104-300-A1
68 Execution units 46
8704 Shader 5888
96 Render Output Units 96
272 Texture Units 184
Memory
10 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6
1.188 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
760 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
320 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.440 GHz Base Clock 1.500 GHz
1.710 GHz Boost Clock 1.770 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
320 W TDP 240 W
370 W TDP (up) 250 W
93 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 3 x 80 mm
1 x 80 mm Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
41-44 dB Noise (Load) 42-43 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 2x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
320 mm Length 282 mm
128 mm Height 115 mm
56 mm Width 41 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N3080EAGLE-10GD Part-no GV-N3070EAGLE OC-8GD
Q4/2020 Release date Q4/2020
749 $ Release price 679 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G
2. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming
3. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G
4. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G
5. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
6. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Phoenix GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Phoenix
7. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1
8. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER AMP Extreme GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER AMP Extreme
9. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 8G
10. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
11. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME 24G
12. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 3070
13. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
14. Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G
15. Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Phantom GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Phantom vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G
16. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Vision OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Vision OC 8G
17. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Sea Hawk EK X GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Sea Hawk EK X vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G
18. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Work The Frames Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Work The Frames Edition
19. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800
20. ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G
21. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X 10G OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X 10G OC
22. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix
23. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G
24. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Sea Hawk X GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Sea Hawk X
25. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Ventus GP OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Ventus GP OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter