MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) vs. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO

GPU comparison with benchmarks

MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G)
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
TU104 GPU Chip TU104
40 Execution units 40
2560 Shader 2560
64 Render Output Units 64
160 Texture Units 160
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.605 GHz Base Clock 1.605 GHz
1.770 GHz Boost Clock 1.800 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
Avg (Game) Clock 1.77 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
215 W TDP 215 W
-- TDP (up) --
88 °C Tjunction max 88 °C
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
1 x 90 mm Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
240 mm Length 267 mm
142 mm Height 118 mm
42 mm Width 58 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
M-NRTX2070S/6RGHPPP-F385-1G Part-no DUAL-RTX2070S-8G-EVO
Q3/2019 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
2. ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6700 XT OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6700 XT OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming Trio ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming Trio
6. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5700 XT OC Evo MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5700 XT OC Evo vs MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G)
7. MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G
8. MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) MSI GeForce RTX 2070 AERO ITX 8G MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) vs MSI GeForce RTX 2070 AERO ITX 8G
9. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
10. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
11. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO Zotac GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 AMP White Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs Zotac GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 AMP White Edition
12. Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ghost OC MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ghost OC vs MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G)
13. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
14. XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
15. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
17. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
18. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS Turbo GeForce GTX 1080 TI ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Turbo GeForce GTX 1080 TI
19. ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo vs MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G)
20. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070
21. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W vs MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (F385-1G)
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080
24. ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT BE 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT BE 8G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter