MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
-VS-
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Based on AMD Radeon RX 580
TU106 GPU Chip Polaris 20 XT
30 Execution units 36
1920 Shader 2304
48 Render Output Units 32
120 Texture Units 144
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR5
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
336 GB/s Memory Bandwith 256 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.365 GHz Base Clock 1.257 GHz
1.710 GHz Boost Clock 1.360 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
160 W TDP 185 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 3 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 2x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
231 mm Length 242 mm
128 mm Height 129 mm
42 mm Width 38 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
720 g Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no DUAL-RX580-8G
Q1/2019 Release date Q4/2017
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 14 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming Trio MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming Trio
2. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
3. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO 10G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO 10G
4. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
5. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Eagle OC 8G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Eagle OC 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
6. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT OC 4G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT OC 4G
7. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Advanced OC-V MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Advanced OC-V
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
9. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G
10. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
11. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6700 XT vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
13. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO
14. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS
15. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC MANLI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (M1453+N502-00) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs MANLI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (M1453+N502-00)
16. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G
17. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
18. XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
19. ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
20. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
21. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G
22. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
23. ASRock Radeon RX 5700 Challenger D 8G OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G ASRock Radeon RX 5700 Challenger D 8G OC vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
24. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 (ZT-T20600K-10M) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 (ZT-T20600K-10M) vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter