ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo vs. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo
-VS-
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
GPU
AMD Radeon RX 5700 Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Navi 10 GPU Chip TU116-300-A1
36 Execution units 22
2304 Shader 1408
64 Render Output Units 48
144 Texture Units 88
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.610 GHz Base Clock 1.530 GHz
1.750 GHz Boost Clock 1.830 GHz
1.73 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
180 W TDP 125 W
220 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
1 x 80 mm Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
44 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 3
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED MSI Mystic Light
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode / Encode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
282 mm Length 248 mm
128 mm Height 128 mm
54 mm Width 52 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 974 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no --
Q3/2019 Release date Q4/2019
349 $ Release price --
7 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo
2. ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming
3. ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G
4. ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 EX Gamer (1-Click OC) ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 EX Gamer (1-Click OC)
5. INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 TWIN X2 OC MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 TWIN X2 OC vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
6. MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (P1456) ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super (P1456) vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo
7. ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Sea Hawk EK X ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Sea Hawk EK X
8. ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Founders Edition ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Founders Edition
9. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER HOF 10th Anniversary Black Edition ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER HOF 10th Anniversary Black Edition vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo
10. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
11. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5600 XT Windforce 6G MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5600 XT Windforce 6G vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
12. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 MINI MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 MINI
13. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
14. EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC ULTRA OC MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC ULTRA OC vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
15. MSI GeForce GTX 1060 GAMING 3G ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo MSI GeForce GTX 1060 GAMING 3G vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo
16. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Windforce 2X 8G (rev. 1.0/2.0) MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Windforce 2X 8G (rev. 1.0/2.0) vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 Evo ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 Evo vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo
18. ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
19. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ARMOR OC MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ARMOR OC
20. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity LHR MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity LHR vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
21. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER TWIN X2 OC MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER TWIN X2 OC vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
22. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 WINDFORCE 6G (rev. 1.0) MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 WINDFORCE 6G (rev. 1.0) vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS
23. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle 8G ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle 8G vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 OC Evo
24. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING PLUS MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING PLUS
25. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5500 XT OC MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5500 XT OC vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS


back to index
Facebook
Twitter