ASUS Turbo GeForce GTX 1080 vs. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Turbo GeForce GTX 1080
-VS-
ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GP104-400-A1 / GP104-410-A1 GPU Chip GA102-300-A1
20 Execution units 82
2560 Shader 10496
64 Render Output Units 112
160 Texture Units 328
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 24 GB
GDDR5X Memory Type GDDR6X
1.251 GHz Memory Speed 1.219 GHz
320 GB/s Memory Bandwith 936 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 384 bit
Clock Speeds
1.607 GHz Base Clock 1.395 GHz
1.733 GHz Boost Clock 1.725 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.70 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
180 W TDP 350 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max 93 °C
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Radial Fan-Type --
1 x 70 mm Fan 1 --
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Water cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 0 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
2x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
1 DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
267 mm Length 216 mm
111 mm Height 136 mm
38 mm Width 20 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 1 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
TURBO-GTX1080-8G Part-no RTX3090-24G-EK
Q2/2016 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price 1,639 $
16 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
2. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB 24G
3. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ARMOR ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ARMOR vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
5. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA HYDRO COPPER GAMING ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA HYDRO COPPER GAMING
6. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
7. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phantom GS ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phantom GS
8. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 ASRock Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Formula 16GB ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs ASRock Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Formula 16GB
9. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer Pink (1-Click OC) ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer Pink (1-Click OC)
10. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
11. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC
12. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
13. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Twin Fan ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Twin Fan vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
14. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER FTW3 GAMING ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER FTW3 GAMING vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
15. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2060 XTREME 6G (rev. 2.0) ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2060 XTREME 6G (rev. 2.0)
16. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
17. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced OC-V ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced OC-V
18. ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
19. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
20. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V
21. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G
22. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC (GDDR6/TU106) ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC (GDDR6/TU106)
23. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC
24. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce 8G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce 8G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090
25. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3090 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter