EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GPU comparison with benchmarksIn the gpu comparison between the EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, we compare both the technical data and the benchmark results of the two graphics cards.
|
||
GPUThe EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ is based on the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and has 2816 texture shaders and 22 execution units. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, which has 1920 shaders and 15 execution units. |
||
| EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ | GPU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 |
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Based on | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 |
| GM200-310-A1 | GPU Chip | GP104-200-A1 |
| Maxwell 2.0 | Architecture | Pascal |
| 22 | Streaming Multiprocessors | 15 |
| 2816 | Shader | 1920 |
| 96 | Render Output Units | 64 |
| 176 | Texture Units | 120 |
| 0 | Raytracing Cores | 0 |
MemoryThe EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ has 6 GB of graphics memory of the type GDDR5 and achieves a memory bandwidth of 337 GB/s. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 can access 8 GB GDDR5 graphics memory and thus achieves a memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s. |
||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 1.753 GHz | Memory Clock | 2.002 GHz |
| 7.0 Gbps | Memory Speed | 8.0 Gbps |
| 337 GB/s | Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| 384 bit | Memory Interface | 256 bit |
Clock SpeedsThe EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ clocks in the base with up to 1.190 GHz. The base frequency of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is 1.506 GHz. |
||
| 1.190 GHz | Base Clock | 1.506 GHz |
| 1.291 GHz | Boost Clock | 1.683 GHz |
| Avg (Game) Clock | ||
| Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
Thermal DesignThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ is 250 W. The graphics card is supplied with energy via the 2 x 8-Pin connector. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has a TDP of 150 W and is supplied with the required energy via 1 x 8-Pin PCIe power connectors. |
||
| 250 W | TDP | 150 W |
| -- | TDP (up) | -- |
| 91 °C | Tjunction max | 94 °C |
| 2 x 8-Pin | PCIe-Power | 1 x 8-Pin |
Cooler & FansThe EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ has a total of 2 Axial fans. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has 1 Radial fans to cool the GPU and memory. |
||
| Axial | Fan-Type | Radial |
| 2 x 90 mm | Fan 1 | 1 x 70 mm |
| -- | Fan 2 | -- |
| Air cooling | Cooler-Type | Air cooling |
| 0 dB | Noise (Idle) | 0 dB |
| -- | Noise (Load) | -- |
ConnectivityIn the connectivity category, we recorded the number of ports on a graphics card. A total of 4 screens can be connected to the EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 supports a maximum of 4 screens. |
||
| 4 | Max. Displays | 4 |
| 2.2 | HDCP-Version | 2.2 |
| 1x HDMI v2.0 | HDMI Ports | 1x HDMI v2.0b |
| 3x DP v1.2 | DP Ports | 3x DP v1.4 |
| 1 | DVI Ports | 1 |
| -- | VGA Ports | -- |
| -- | USB-C Ports | -- |
FeaturesetThe EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ supports a maximum resolution of 4096x2160 pixels. The maximum resolution of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is 7680x4320 pixels. |
||
| 4096x2160 | Max. resolution | 7680x4320 |
| 12_1 | DirectX | 12_1 |
| No | Raytracing | No |
| No | DLSS / FSR | Yes |
| No LED lighting | LED | No LED lighting |
Supported Video CodecsThe support and acceleration of certain video codecs directly in the graphics card reduces the load when playing or creating videos. |
||
| Decode / Encode | h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | h265 / HEVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | AV1 | No |
| Decode | VP8 | Decode |
| No | VP9 | Decode |
DimensionsThe EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ is 267 mm long, 111 mm high and -- wide. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is 267 mm long, 111 mm high and 38 mm wide. |
||
| 267 mm | Length | 267 mm |
| 111 mm | Height | 111 mm |
| -- | Width | 38 mm |
| 2 PCIe-Slots | Width (Slots) | 2 PCIe-Slots |
| -- | Weight | -- |
| PCIe 3 x 16 | GPU Interface | PCIe 3.0 x 16 |
Additional dataThe EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+ was released in Q4/2015 at a price of 699 $. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 was introduced in Q2/2016 at a price of 379 $ (Reference). |
||
| 06G-P4-4996-KR | Part-no | -- |
| Q4/2015 | Release date | Q2/2016 |
| 699 $ | Launch Price | 379 $ (Reference) |
| 28 nm | Structure size | 16 nm |
| data sheet | Documents | data sheet |
1.190 GHz, 6 GB (250 W TDP)
Buy this graphic card at amazon!
1.506 GHz, 8 GB (150 W TDP)
Buy this graphic card at amazon!
Rate these graphics cards now
Benchmark results
3DMark Benchmark (DirectX, Raytracing)
3DMark is a benchmark program that determines the performance of certain components of a computer and then reports the performance as a numerical value.
Time Spy Extreme Graphics score
|
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+
6 GB GDDR5 |
||
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8 GB GDDR5 |
||
Port Royal (Raytracing)
|
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8 GB GDDR5 |
||
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a visually stunning game that is ideal as a graphics card benchmark. We test the game with maximum details on Windows 10.
3840x2160 (2160p)
|
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8 GB GDDR5 |
||
2560x1440 (1440p)
|
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8 GB GDDR5 |
||
1920x1080 (1080p)
|
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8 GB GDDR5 |
||
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL, Vulkan, Metal)
Geekbench 6 is a cross-platform benchmark for main processors, which also carries out 3 different graphics benchmarks and outputs them in the form of a numerical value.
Geekbench 6 - OpenCL
|
|
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+
6 GB GDDR5 |
||
|
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8 GB GDDR5 |
||
Geekbench 6 - Vulkan
|
|
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+
6 GB GDDR5 |
||
|
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8 GB GDDR5 |
||
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second.
FP32 (TFLOPS)
|
|
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+
6 GB GDDR5 |
||
|
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8 GB GDDR5 |
||
Popular comparisons
