GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0) vs. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0)
-VS-
INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
TU106 GPU Chip GA106-300-A1
30 Execution units 28
1920 Shader 3584
48 Render Output Units 64
120 Texture Units 112
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.875 GHz
336 GB/s Memory Bandwith 360 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.365 GHz Base Clock 1.320 GHz
1.755 GHz Boost Clock 1.792 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.78 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
160 W TDP 170 W
-- TDP (up) 170 W
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 36 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
226 mm Length 240 mm
122 mm Height 120 mm
41 mm Width --
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N2060OC-6GD Part-no N30602-12D6X-11902120
Q1/2019 Release date Q1/2021
-- Release price 419 $
12 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC
2. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 iChiLL X3 RED INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 iChiLL X3 RED
3. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming
4. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G
5. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost
6. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0) vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G
7. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
8. GALAX GeForce RTX 3060 EX (1-Click OC) INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC GALAX GeForce RTX 3060 EX (1-Click OC) vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
9. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
10. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3060 Ultra W OC 12G-V INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3060 Ultra W OC 12G-V vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
11. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 HOF Premium INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 HOF Premium vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
12. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC MSI Radeon RX 5700 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 8G
13. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
14. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING OC X3 INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING OC X3 vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
15. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
16. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G
17. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC
18. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G
19. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G
20. SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0) SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0)
21. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1 INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1 vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
22. MSI Radeon RX 580 Armor 8G OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC MSI Radeon RX 580 Armor 8G OC vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
23. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB DUO 12G-V INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB DUO 12G-V vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC
24. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0) vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G
25. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060


back to index
Facebook
Twitter