INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet vs. MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet
-VS-
MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Based on AMD RX Vega 64
GP102-350-K1-A1 GPU Chip Vega 10 XT
28 Execution units 64
3584 Shader 4096
88 Render Output Units 64
224 Texture Units 256
Memory
11 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR5X Memory Type HBM2
1.376 GHz Memory Speed 0.945 GHz
484 GB/s Memory Bandwith 484 GB/s
352 bit Memory Interface 2048 bit
Clock Speeds
1.480 GHz Base Clock 1.247 GHz
1.582 GHz Boost Clock 1.546 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
250 W TDP 295 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Radial Fan-Type Radial
1 x 70 mm Fan 1 1 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version --
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_1
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
267 mm Length 270 mm
111 mm Height 110 mm
38 mm Width 40 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 1068 g
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
N108T-2DDN-Q6MN Part-no --
Q4/2017 Release date Q3/2017
-- Release price --
16 nm Structure size 14 nm
-- Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6/TU106) MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6/TU106) vs MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G
2. INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ghost INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ghost
3. MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ICHILL X3 MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ICHILL X3
4. GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 White Mini (1-Click OC) INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 White Mini (1-Click OC) vs INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet
5. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Xtreme 11G MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Xtreme 11G vs MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G
6. INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet vs MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G
7. Colorful GeForce GTX 1050 Ti LE 4G-V MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G Colorful GeForce GTX 1050 Ti LE 4G-V vs MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G
8. MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC
9. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4G INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4G vs INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet
10. INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XLR8 Gaming OC Triple Fan INNO3D GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Jet vs PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XLR8 Gaming OC Triple Fan
11. MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G XFX Speedster MERC308 Radeon RX 6600 XT BLACK Gaming MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Air Boost 8G vs XFX Speedster MERC308 Radeon RX 6600 XT BLACK Gaming


back to index
Facebook
Twitter