KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
-VS-
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
TU104 GPU Chip GA104-300-A1
40 Execution units 46
2560 Shader 5888
64 Render Output Units 96
160 Texture Units 184
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.605 GHz Base Clock 1.500 GHz
1.770 GHz Boost Clock 1.725 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
215 W TDP 220 W
-- TDP (up) 250 W
88 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Radial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 65 mm Fan 1 3 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 36-37 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
283 mm Length 305 mm
139 mm Height 121 mm
41 mm Width 52 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 992 g
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
27ISL6MD32BK Part-no --
Q3/2019 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price 649 $
12 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
2. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Z Trio 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Z Trio 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
3. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
4. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
5. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G vs PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 XT
6. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
7. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G ASUS GeForce GTX 1650 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G vs ASUS GeForce GTX 1650
8. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 Twin X2 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 Twin X2 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
10. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan Edition vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
11. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
12. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming 8G KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming 8G
13. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 3070 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G vs ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 3070
14. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G
15. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G OC
16. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer (1-Click OC) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer (1-Click OC) vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
17. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 Ti SG (1-Click OC) V2 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 Ti SG (1-Click OC) V2
18. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
19. EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER SC ULTRA GAMING MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER SC ULTRA GAMING vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
20. PNY GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB Dual Fan KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER PNY GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB Dual Fan vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
21. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Trio 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Trio 8G
22. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G
23. EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
24. MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT MECH 2X 12G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT MECH 2X 12G OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
25. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Twin Fan KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Twin Fan


back to index
Facebook
Twitter