MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G vs. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition

GPU comparison with benchmarks

MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
-VS-
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GA102-300-A1 GPU Chip GA106-300-A1
82 Execution units 28
10496 Shader 3584
112 Render Output Units 64
328 Texture Units 112
Memory
24 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6
1.219 GHz Memory Speed 1.875 GHz
936 GB/s Memory Bandwith 360 GB/s
384 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.395 GHz Base Clock 1.320 GHz
1.875 GHz Boost Clock 1.912 GHz
1.86 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.88 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
420 W TDP 170 W
450 W TDP (up) 210 W
93 °C Tjunction max --
3 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 100 mm Fan 1 3 x 95 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
42-46 dB Noise (Load) 32-34 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
336 mm Length 300 mm
140 mm Height 134 mm
61 mm Width 54 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
1895 g Weight 1123 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
V388-010R Part-no ROG-STRIX-RTX3060-O12G-GAMING
Q4/2020 Release date Q1/2021
1,649 $ Release price 579 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
2. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
3. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
4. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
5. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
6. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070
7. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G
8. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
9. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME 24G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
10. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
11. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
12. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC
13. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
14. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition
15. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
17. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC
18. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
19. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G
20. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB XLR8 Gaming UPRISING EPIC-X RGB MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G vs PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB XLR8 Gaming UPRISING EPIC-X RGB
21. PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
22. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
23. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G
24. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
25. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition


back to index
Facebook
Twitter