Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream vs. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream
-VS-
Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GA104-300-A1 GPU Chip GA102-300-A1
46 Execution units 82
5888 Shader 10496
96 Render Output Units 112
184 Texture Units 328
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 24 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6X
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.219 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 936 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 384 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.395 GHz
1.725 GHz Boost Clock 1.725 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
250 W TDP 350 W
-- TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 3 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
43-44 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
304 mm Length 294 mm
136 mm Height 112 mm
60 mm Width --
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
NE63070019P2-1040J Part-no NED3090S19SB-132BX
Q4/2020 Release date Q3/2020
599 $ Release price 1,579 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
2. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream
3. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
6. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition
7. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom GS Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom GS
8. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
9. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
10. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
11. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming
12. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
13. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER JET Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER JET vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
14. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS vs Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC
15. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 White Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 White vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
16. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity OC Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
17. ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
18. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream vs PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan
19. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
20. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
21. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
22. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
23. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream
24. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Eagle 8G Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Eagle 8G vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS
25. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phoenix GS


back to index
Facebook
Twitter