PNY RTX A2000
vs
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Description

In the gpu comparison between the PNY RTX A2000 and the ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650, we compare both the technical data and the benchmark results of the two graphics cards.

The PNY RTX A2000 is based on the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (Ampere) and has 6 GB GDDR6 graphics memory with a bandwidth of 288 GB/s. The 3328 shader units clock with a maximum of 1.20 GHz which results in an FP32 processing power of 8.00 TFLOPS.

The ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 is based on the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5) (Turing) and has 4 GB GDDR5 graphics memory with a bandwidth of 128 GB/s. The 896 shader units have a maximum clock rate of 1.70 GHz and achieve an FP32 computing power of 3.04 TFLOPS.

GPU

The GPU core data includes the number of execution units and texture shaders. Both have a major impact on the computing power of a graphics card.
PNY RTX A2000 GPU ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5)
GA106 GPU Chip TU117-300-A1
Ampere Architecture Turing
26 Execution units 14
3328 Shader 896
48 Render Output Units 32
104 Texture Units 56
26 Raytracing Cores 0

Memory

A large graphics memory is important to process large and detailed textures quickly, even in high resolutions. The speed of the memory and the resulting memory bandwidth are also important for this.

6 GB Memory Size 4 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR5
1.500 GHz Memory Clock 2.000 GHz
12 Gbps Memory Speed 8 Gbps
288 GB/s Memory Bandwith 128 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 128 bit

Clock Speeds

The clock frequency of a graphics card determines the speed in connection with the graphics architecture. New manufacturing processes are making ever higher clock frequencies possible, whereby attention must also be paid to the energy consumption of the graphics card, as this also depends to a large extent on the clock frequency.

0.562 GHz Base Clock 1.485 GHz
1.200 GHz Boost Clock 1.695 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.67 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes

Thermal Design

The TDP defines the maximum power consumption of a graphics card. The ventilation of the computer and the performance of the power supply are based on the TDP and should be optimized for it.

70 W TDP 75 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin

Cooler & Fans

The cooler type as well as the number and size of the fans of a graphics card result in its volume. A loud graphics card can easily be perceived as annoying. Generally, larger fans are better because they can spin slower to move the same volume of air as opposed to smaller fans.

Radial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 40 mm Fan 1 2 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
dB Noise (Idle) dB
-- Noise (Load) --

Connectivity

In the connectivity category, we recorded the number of ports on a graphics card. You can also find out here the maximum number of screens you can connect to the graphics card.

4 Max. Displays 3
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
-- HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
4x DP v1.4 DP Ports 1x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --

Featureset

Here we show you which functions a graphics card has. We've also included ray tracing support for true simulation of light rays and shadows.

7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 (Ultimate) DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting

Supported Video Codecs

The support and acceleration of certain video codecs directly in the graphics card reduces the load when playing or creating videos. This can have a positive impact on the lower energy consumption and less waste heat from the graphics card.

Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode

Dimensions

With the exact dimensions of a graphics card you can check whether it fits into your computer case. We also show you the PCI Express standard that the graphics card supports at most.

168 mm Length 204 mm
69 mm Height 115 mm
-- Width 37 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16

Additional data

In addition to data such as the release date and the price when the graphics card is released, we usually show you a link to the data sheet for the graphics card directly from the manufacturer.

VCNRTXA2000-PB Part-no DUAL-GTX1650-4G
Q3/2021 Release date Q2/2019
500 $ Launch Price 149 $ (Reference)
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark (DirectX, Raytracing) - Time Spy Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark program that determines the performance of certain components of a computer and then reports the performance as a numerical value. Here at GPU-Monkey we only use selected benchmarks for the graphics card, which are determined with a sufficiently fast processor so that the processor does not negatively affect the performance of the graphics card.




3DMark Benchmark (DirectX, Raytracing) - Time Spy Extreme Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark program that determines the performance of certain components of a computer and then reports the performance as a numerical value. Here at GPU-Monkey we only use selected benchmarks for the graphics card, which are determined with a sufficiently fast processor so that the processor does not negatively affect the performance of the graphics card.




3DMark Benchmark (DirectX, Raytracing) - Fire Strike Extreme Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark program that determines the performance of certain components of a computer and then reports the performance as a numerical value. Here at GPU-Monkey we only use selected benchmarks for the graphics card, which are determined with a sufficiently fast processor so that the processor does not negatively affect the performance of the graphics card.




3DMark Benchmark (DirectX, Raytracing) - Port Royal (Raytracing)

3DMark is a benchmark program that determines the performance of certain components of a computer and then reports the performance as a numerical value. Here at GPU-Monkey we only use selected benchmarks for the graphics card, which are determined with a sufficiently fast processor so that the processor does not negatively affect the performance of the graphics card.




3DMark Benchmark (DirectX, Raytracing) - Speed Way Graphics Score (Raytracing)

3DMark is a benchmark program that determines the performance of certain components of a computer and then reports the performance as a numerical value. Here at GPU-Monkey we only use selected benchmarks for the graphics card, which are determined with a sufficiently fast processor so that the processor does not negatively affect the performance of the graphics card.




Geekbench 5 (CUDA, OpenCL, Vulkan, Metal) - Geekbench 5 - CUDA (NVIDIA only)

Geekbench 5 is primarily a cross-platform benchmark for main processors, which runs through various tests in order to finally output the processor's performance in the form of a numerical value. In addition to the CPU benchmark, Geekbench can also run 4 different graphics benchmarks and output them in the form of a numerical value.
Zusätzlich zum CPU-Benchmark kann Geekbench auch 4 verschiedene Grafik-Benchmarks durchführen und in Form eines Zahlenwertes ausgeben.




Geekbench 5 (CUDA, OpenCL, Vulkan, Metal) - Geekbench 5 - OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is primarily a cross-platform benchmark for main processors, which runs through various tests in order to finally output the processor's performance in the form of a numerical value. In addition to the CPU benchmark, Geekbench can also run 4 different graphics benchmarks and output them in the form of a numerical value.
Zusätzlich zum CPU-Benchmark kann Geekbench auch 4 verschiedene Grafik-Benchmarks durchführen und in Form eines Zahlenwertes ausgeben.




Geekbench 5 (CUDA, OpenCL, Vulkan, Metal) - Geekbench 5 - Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is primarily a cross-platform benchmark for main processors, which runs through various tests in order to finally output the processor's performance in the form of a numerical value. In addition to the CPU benchmark, Geekbench can also run 4 different graphics benchmarks and output them in the form of a numerical value.
Zusätzlich zum CPU-Benchmark kann Geekbench auch 4 verschiedene Grafik-Benchmarks durchführen und in Form eines Zahlenwertes ausgeben.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Popular comparisons

1. PNY RTX A4000 PNY RTX A2000 PNY RTX A4000 vs PNY RTX A2000
2. PNY RTX A2000 ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR PNY RTX A2000 vs ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
3. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
4. PNY RTX A2000 ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3060 Ti V2 LHR PNY RTX A2000 vs ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3060 Ti V2 LHR
5. PNY RTX A2000 Gainward GeForce RTX 3050 Ghost PNY RTX A2000 vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3050 Ghost
6. PNY RTX A2000 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 PNY RTX A2000 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
7. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6400 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6400 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
8. PNY RTX A2000 ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB PNY RTX A2000 vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
9. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
10. PNY RTX A2000 MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G PNY RTX A2000 vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter