ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
Benchmark and Specs

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
GPU Memory
Based on: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR Memory Size: 8 GB
GPU Chip: GA104-302-A1 Memory Type: GDDR6
Execution units: 46 Memory Speed: 1.75 GHz
Shader: 5888 Memory Bandwith: 448 GB/s
Render Output Units: 96 Memory Interface: 256 bit
Texture Units: 184
Clock Speeds Thermal Design
Base Clock: 1.500 GHz TDP: 220 W
Boost Clock: 1.800 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 4 % TDP (up): 250 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 4 %
Avg (Game) Clock: 1.770 GHz Tjunction max: 93 °C
Overclocking: Yes PCIe-Power: 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Fan-Type: Axial Cooler-Type: Air cooling
Fan 1: 2 x 100 mm Noise (Idle): 0 dB / Silent
Fan 2: -- Noise (Load): 43-45 dB
Connectivity Featureset
Max. Displays: 4 Max. resolution: 7680x4320
HDCP-Version: 2.3 DirectX: 12_2
HDMI Ports: 2x HDMI v2.1 Raytracing: Yes
DP Ports: 3x DP v1.4a DLSS / FSR: Yes
DVI Ports: -- LED: No LED lighting
VGA Ports: --
USB-C Ports: --
Supported Video Codecs
h264: Decode / Encode VP8: Decode
h265 / HEVC: Decode / Encode VP9: Decode
AV1: Decode
Dimensions Additional data
Length: 267 mm GPU Interface: PCIe 4.0 x 16
Height: 135 mm Release date: Q2/2021
Width: 52 mm Release price: 659 $
Width (Slots): 3 PCIe-Slots Structure size: 8 nm
Weight: -- Part-no: --
Documents: data sheet


Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.






Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo
2. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
3. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
4. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 Ti X3 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 Ti X3 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
6. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
7. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080
8. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
10. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC V2 LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
11. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 125 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 125 W
12. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 MINI ITX 8G V2 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 MINI ITX 8G V2
13. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 V2 LHR
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V
15. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GT OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GT OC
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming OC White 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming OC White 8G
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT
18. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
19. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming
20. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Fan 8G LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Fan 8G LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
21. MANLI GeForce GTX 1080Ti (F369G+N470) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR MANLI GeForce GTX 1080Ti (F369G+N470) vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 GAMING 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 GAMING 8G
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT


back to index
Facebook
Twitter