ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs. Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
-VS-
Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
TU117-300-A1 / TU106-125-A1 / TU116-150-KA-A1 GPU Chip GP106-300-A1
14 Execution units 9
896 Shader 1152
32 Render Output Units 48
56 Texture Units 72
Memory
4 GB Memory Size 3 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR5
1.5 GHz Memory Speed 2.002 GHz
192 GB/s Memory Bandwith 192 GB/s
128 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.410 GHz Base Clock 1.544 GHz
1.620 GHz Boost Clock 1.759 GHz
1.59 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
75 W TDP 120 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 80 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports 1x DP v1.4
1 DVI Ports 2
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_1
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 No
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
206 mm Length --
125 mm Height --
46 mm Width --
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) --
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
TUF-GTX1650-4GD6-GAMING Part-no --
Q2/2020 Release date Q3/2016
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 16 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 OC (GDDR6) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 OC (GDDR6)
2. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
3. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
4. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
5. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
6. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Ghost ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Ghost
7. GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
8. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS EX (1-Click OC) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS EX (1-Click OC) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
10. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G
11. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
13. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix
14. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
15. Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W
16. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GT OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GT OC
17. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX (1-Click OC)
18. MSI GeForce GTX 1060 GAMING 6G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) MSI GeForce GTX 1060 GAMING 6G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
19. MSI GeForce GTX 1050 2G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) MSI GeForce GTX 1050 2G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
20. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V
21. Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Turbo 8G Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Turbo 8G
22. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V
23. GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (1-Click OC) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) GALAX GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (1-Click OC) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
24. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V
25. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G vs Colorful GeForce GTX 1060 NB 3G-V


back to index
Facebook
Twitter