Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V vs. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V
-VS-
PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR
GP102-350-K1-A1 GPU Chip GA104-302-A1
28 Execution units 46
3584 Shader 5888
88 Render Output Units 96
224 Texture Units 184
Memory
11 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR5X Memory Type GDDR6
1.376 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
484 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
352 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.480 GHz Base Clock 1.500 GHz
1.708 GHz Boost Clock 1.725 GHz
1.59 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
250 W TDP 220 W
-- TDP (up) 240 W
-- Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial (Radiator) Fan-Type Axial
2 x 120 mm Fan 1 3 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
AIO water cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
0 dB Noise (Load) 42 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
2x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
1 DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
iGame Energy Core LED Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
-- Length 294 mm
-- Height 112 mm
-- Width 56 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no VCG30708LTFXPPB
Q1/2017 Release date Q2/2021
-- Release price 549 $
16 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge vs PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR
2. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 Ti X3 PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 Ti X3
3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V
4. ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Advanced PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Advanced vs PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR
5. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME 24G PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME 24G
6. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC 8G Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC 8G
7. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 8G Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 8G vs Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V
8. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo
9. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin Gaming Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin Gaming
10. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO OC Edition Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO OC Edition
11. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT Black Gaming PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT Black Gaming vs PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR
12. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
13. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V
14. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan Edition PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan Edition vs PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR
15. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming Z Trio 8G LHR PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming Z Trio 8G LHR
16. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming 8G LHR PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming 8G LHR
17. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
18. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 COMPACT V2 Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V vs INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 COMPACT V2
19. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V vs PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR
20. MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING X 12G PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING X 12G vs PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR
21. Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Ti StormX Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Ti StormX vs Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V
22. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus XS PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus XS
23. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Z Trio 8G LHR PNY GeForce RTX 3070 XLR8 Gaming Revel Epic-X RGB Triple Fan LHR vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Z Trio 8G LHR
24. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V Colorful GeForce GTX 1650 EX 4GD6-V Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V vs Colorful GeForce GTX 1650 EX 4GD6-V
25. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR vs Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Neptune W-V


back to index
Facebook
Twitter