GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
- vs -
INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB X3

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
-VS-
INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB X3

GPU

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
TU117-300-A1 / TU106-125-A1 / TU116-150-KA-A1 GPU Chip GA102-350-A1
14 Execution units 84
896 Shader 10752
32 Render Output Units 112
56 Texture Units 336

Memory

4 GB Memory Size 24 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6X
1.500 GHz Memory Clock 1.313 GHz
12 Gbps Memory Speed 21 Gbps
192 GB/s Memory Bandwith 1008 GB/s
128 bit Memory Interface 384 bit

Clock Speeds

1.410 GHz Base Clock 1.560 GHz
1.590 GHz Boost Clock 1.860 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes

Thermal Design

75 W TDP 450 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max 93 °C
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 16-Pin

Cooler & Fans

Axial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 90 mm Fan 1 3 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --

Connectivity

3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
1 DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --

Featureset

7680 x 4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED Addressable LED

Supported Video Codecs

Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode

Dimensions

167 mm Length 330 mm
69 mm Height 140 mm
39 mm Width --
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16

Additional data

GV-N1656D6-4GL Part-no --
Q2/2020 Release date Q1/2022
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Popular comparisons

1. ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1060 3GB GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
2. ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 OC edition 2GB GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 OC edition 2GB vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
3. PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 64 GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
4. KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (1-Click OC) GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (1-Click OC) vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
5. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
6. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Gaming OC 12G GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Gaming OC 12G
7. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Twin-V GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Twin-V vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
8. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
9. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
10. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G Colorful GeForce GTX 1660 NB 6G-V GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G vs Colorful GeForce GTX 1660 NB 6G-V
11. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
12. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
13. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G Palit GeForce GTX 1650 GP V1 GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G vs Palit GeForce GTX 1650 GP V1
14. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
15. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger ITX GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger ITX
16. EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 GAMING Black Edition GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 GAMING Black Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
17. MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT GAMING 8G GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT GAMING 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
18. XFX Speedster SWFT 210 AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Core Gaming GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G XFX Speedster SWFT 210 AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Core Gaming vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
19. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G vs PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition
20. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X PLUS 10G LHR GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X PLUS 10G LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
21. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo
22. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING Z TRIO 10G LHR GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING Z TRIO 10G LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
23. EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER SC ULTRA GAMING GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER SC ULTRA GAMING vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
24. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming OC 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G
25. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Low Profile 4G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650


back to index
Facebook
Twitter