ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs. Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
-VS-
Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GA104-302-A1 GPU Chip GA102-300-A1
46 Execution units 82
5888 Shader 10496
96 Render Output Units 112
184 Texture Units 328
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 24 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6X
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.219 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 936 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 384 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.395 GHz
1.800 GHz Boost Clock 1.695 GHz
1.77 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
220 W TDP 350 W
250 W TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 1 x 80 mm
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
43-45 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
267 mm Length 310 mm
135 mm Height 131 mm
52 mm Width 57 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no --
Q2/2021 Release date Q4/2020
659 $ Release price --
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V
2. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NB-V Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NB-V vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
6. Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V Palit GeForce RTX 3060 StormX OC Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V vs Palit GeForce RTX 3060 StormX OC
7. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
8. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 Ti X3 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 Ti X3 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
9. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
10. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080
11. Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Pegasus Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Pegasus
12. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
13. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC V2 LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
15. Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 Evo Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 Evo
16. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 125 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 125 W
18. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V
19. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 MINI ITX 8G V2 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 MINI ITX 8G V2
20. GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 White Mini (1-Click OC) Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 White Mini (1-Click OC) vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V
21. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GT OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GT OC
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 V2 LHR
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3090 NB-V
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming OC White 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming OC White 8G
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT


back to index
Facebook
Twitter