Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC
-VS-
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GA102-300-A1 GPU Chip GA102-300-A1
82 Execution units 82
10496 Shader 10496
112 Render Output Units 112
328 Texture Units 328
Memory
24 GB Memory Size 24 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6X
1.219 GHz Memory Speed 1.219 GHz
936 GB/s Memory Bandwith 936 GB/s
384 bit Memory Interface 384 bit
Clock Speeds
1.395 GHz Base Clock 1.395 GHz
1.845 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 9 % Boost Clock 1.770 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 4 %
Avg (Game) Clock 1.74 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
420 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 20 % TDP 350 W
-- TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
3 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 3 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 95 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 37-42 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Addressable LED LED ASUS Aura Sync
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
304 mm Length 300 mm
136 mm Height 127 mm
60 mm Width 52 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
NED3090H19SB-1021G Part-no TUF-RTX3090-O24G-GAMING
Q3/2020 Release date Q4/2020
1,649 $ Release price 1,649 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC
2. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming
3. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC
4. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC
5. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro OC Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC
6. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC
7. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G
8. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
9. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB XLR8 Gaming UPRISING EPIC-X RGB Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB XLR8 Gaming UPRISING EPIC-X RGB
10. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT
11. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
13. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC
14. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
15. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming
16. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC
17. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
18. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition vs Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC
19. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 vs Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC
20. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
21. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL Frostbite ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL Frostbite
22. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G
23. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock
24. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Advanced ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Advanced
25. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter