KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR
Benchmark and Specs

KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR
GPU Memory
Based on: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR Memory Size: 8 GB
GPU Chip: GA104-302-A1 Memory Type: GDDR6
Execution units: 46 Memory Speed: 1.75 GHz
Shader: 5888 Memory Bandwith: 448 GB/s
Render Output Units: 96 Memory Interface: 256 bit
Texture Units: 184
Clock Speeds Thermal Design
Base Clock: 1.500 GHz TDP: 220 W
Boost Clock: 1.785 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 3 % TDP (up): --
Avg (Game) Clock: 1.770 GHz Tjunction max: 93 °C
Overclocking: Yes PCIe-Power: 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Fan-Type: Axial Cooler-Type: Air cooling
Fan 1: 2 x 102 mm Noise (Idle): 0 dB / Silent
Fan 2: -- Noise (Load): --
Connectivity Featureset
Max. Displays: 4 Max. resolution: 7680x4320
HDCP-Version: 2.3 DirectX: 12_2
HDMI Ports: 1x HDMI v2.1 Raytracing: Yes
DP Ports: 3x DP v1.4a DLSS / FSR: Yes
DVI Ports: -- LED: Addressable LED
VGA Ports: --
USB-C Ports: --
Supported Video Codecs
h264: Decode / Encode VP8: Decode
h265 / HEVC: Decode / Encode VP9: Decode
AV1: Decode
Dimensions Additional data
Length: 299 mm GPU Interface: PCIe 4.0 x 16
Height: 139 mm Release date: Q4/2020
Width: 58 mm Release price: --
Width (Slots): 3 PCIe-Slots Structure size: 8 nm
Weight: -- Part-no: 37NSL6MD2VXK
Documents: data sheet


Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.






Popular comparisons

1. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Double Dissipation KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR vs XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Double Dissipation
2. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 EX (1-Click OC) V2 KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 EX (1-Click OC) V2
3. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual V1 LHR KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual V1 LHR vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR
4. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Advanced OC LHR-V KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR vs Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Advanced OC LHR-V
5. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 Ti TWIN X2 KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 Ti TWIN X2 vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR
6. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1060 U-TOP-6G-V KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR vs Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1060 U-TOP-6G-V
7. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC V1 LHR KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR vs Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC V1 LHR
8. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR
9. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom
10. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
11. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger ITX 8GB KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger ITX 8GB
12. EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW HYDRO COPPER GAMING KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW HYDRO COPPER GAMING vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR
13. MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER VENTUS OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER VENTUS OC vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) LHR


back to index
Facebook
Twitter