AMD Radeon R9 Nano
vs
KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC


GPU comparison with benchmarks

In the gpu comparison between the AMD Radeon R9 Nano and the KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC, we compare both the technical data and the benchmark results of the two graphics cards.

GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is based on the AMD Radeon R9 Nano and has 4096 texture shaders and 64 execution units.

KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC is based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, which has 2816 shaders and 22 execution units.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC
AMD Radeon R9 Nano Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Fiji XT CA GPU Chip GM200-310-A1
Fiji Architecture Maxwell 2.0
64 Streaming Multiprocessors 22
4096 Shader 2816
64 Render Output Units 96
256 Texture Units 176
0 Raytracing Cores 0

Memory

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano has 4 GB of graphics memory of the type HBM and achieves a memory bandwidth of 512 GB/s.

The KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC can access 6 GB GDDR5 graphics memory and thus achieves a memory bandwidth of 337 GB/s.

4 GB Memory Size 6 GB
HBM Memory Type GDDR5
0.500 GHz Memory Clock 1.753 GHz
1.0 Gbps Memory Speed 7.0 Gbps
512 GB/s Memory bandwidth 337 GB/s
4096 bit Memory Interface 384 bit

Clock Speeds

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano clocks in the base with up to 1.000 GHz. The base frequency of the KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC is 1.025 GHz.

1.000 GHz Base Clock 1.025 GHz
1.000 GHz Boost Clock 1.114 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes

Thermal Design

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano is 175 W. The graphics card is supplied with energy via the 1 x 8-Pin connector.

The KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC has a TDP of 250 W and is supplied with the required energy via 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe power connectors.

175 W TDP 250 W
-- TDP (up) --
85 °C Tjunction max 91 °C
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin

Cooler & Fans

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano has a total of 1 Axial (Radiator) fans.

The KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC has 3 Axial fans to cool the GPU and memory.

Axial (Radiator) Fan-Type Axial
1 x 90 mm Fan 1 3 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --

Connectivity

In the connectivity category, we recorded the number of ports on a graphics card. A total of 4 screens can be connected to the AMD Radeon R9 Nano.

The KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC supports a maximum of 4 screens.

4 Max. Displays 4
0 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v1.4a HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0
3x DP v1.2 DP Ports 3x DP v1.2
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --

Featureset

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano supports a maximum resolution of 4096x2160 pixels.

The maximum resolution of the KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC is 4096x2160 pixels.

4096x2160 Max. resolution 4096x2160
12_0 DirectX 12_1
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting

Supported Video Codecs

The support and acceleration of certain video codecs directly in the graphics card reduces the load when playing or creating videos.

Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode h265 / HEVC No
No AV1 No
No VP8 Decode
No VP9 No

Dimensions

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is 154 mm long, 112 mm high and 40 mm wide.

The KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC is 281 mm long, 124 mm high and 41 mm wide.

154 mm Length 281 mm
112 mm Height 124 mm
40 mm Width 41 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3 x 16

Additional data

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano was released in Q3/2015 at a price of 649 $ (Reference).

The KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC was introduced in Q3/2015 at a price of 649 $ (Reference).

-- Part-no 98IRH5DH9WGT
Q3/2015 Release date Q3/2015
649 $ (Reference) Launch Price 649 $ (Reference)
28 nm Structure size 28 nm
-- Documents --

Rate these graphics cards now

Here you can rate the AMD Radeon R9 Nano to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:

Benchmark results

3DMark Benchmark (DirectX, Raytracing)

3DMark is a benchmark program that determines the performance of certain components of a computer and then reports the performance as a numerical value.

Time Spy Extreme Graphics score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL, Vulkan, Metal)

Geekbench 6 is a cross-platform benchmark for main processors, which also carries out 3 different graphics benchmarks and outputs them in the form of a numerical value.

Geekbench 6 - OpenCL

Geekbench 6 - Vulkan

Geekbench 6 - Metal

AMD Radeon R9 Nano AMD Radeon R9 Nano
4 GB HBM
57004

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second.

FP32 (TFLOPS)

Popular comparisons

1. AMD Radeon R9 Nano NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2. AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT AMD Radeon R9 Nano AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
3. KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG (1-Click OC) LHR KFA2 GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG (1-Click OC) LHR
4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5 AMD Radeon R9 Nano NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
5. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI AMD Radeon R9 Nano ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
6. AMD Radeon R9 Nano AMD Radeon RX 6600 AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
7. AMD Radeon R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Nano AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
8. AMD Radeon R9 Nano GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6750 XT ELITE 12G AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6750 XT ELITE 12G
9. AMD Radeon R9 Nano NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR5 AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR5
10. AMD Radeon R9 Nano MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Fan 8G OC LHR AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Fan 8G OC LHR


back to index
Facebook
Twitter