Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS
- vs -
ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS
-VS-
ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56

GPU

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Based on AMD RX Vega 56
GA102-225-A1 GPU Chip Vega 10 XL
80 Execution units 56
10240 Shader 3584
96 Render Output Units 64
320 Texture Units 256

Memory

12 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type HBM2
1.188 GHz Memory Clock 0.800 GHz
19 Gbps Memory Speed 1.6 Gbps
912 GB/s Memory Bandwith 410 GB/s
384 bit Memory Interface 2048 bit

Clock Speeds

1.365 GHz Base Clock 1.156 GHz
1.725 GHz Boost Clock 1.471 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes

Thermal Design

400 W TDP 210 W
-- TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max --
3 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin

Cooler & Fans

Axial Fan-Type Radial
3 x 90 mm Fan 1 1 x 70 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 37 dB
-- Noise (Load) 49 dB

Connectivity

4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version --
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --

Featureset

7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Addressable LED LED No LED lighting

Supported Video Codecs

Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode

Dimensions

304 mm Length 280 mm
138 mm Height 127 mm
-- Width 40 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 1090 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16

Additional data

NED308TT19KB-1020M Part-no RXVEGA56-8G
Q3/2021 Release date Q3/2017
-- Release price --
8 nm Structure size 14 nm
data sheet Documents --

Benchmark results

3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2. ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
3. MSI Radeon RX 590 Armor 8G ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 MSI Radeon RX 590 Armor 8G vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
4. Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Ghost OC ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Ghost OC vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
5. ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660
6. ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 MSI Radeon RX 5700 8G ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 8G
7. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Windforce 8G ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Windforce 8G vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
9. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Ventus 11G ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Ventus 11G vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
10. Colorful GeForce GTX 1650 EX 4GD6-V ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 Colorful GeForce GTX 1650 EX 4GD6-V vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
11. ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 ASUS Radeon RX Vega 64 ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 64
12. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
13. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3060 Ultra W OC 12G L-V LHR ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3060 Ultra W OC 12G L-V LHR vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
14. ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
15. ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6600 XT OC ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 vs ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
16. Palit GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GameRock Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS Palit GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GameRock vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS
17. Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS
18. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X 10G LHR Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X 10G LHR vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS
19. ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 MSI GeForce GTX 1050 2G V1 ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 vs MSI GeForce GTX 1050 2G V1
20. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC V2 LHR Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC V2 LHR vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS
21. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC V2 LHR Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC V2 LHR vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS
22. Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS PNY GeForce RTX 2060 Blower Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS vs PNY GeForce RTX 2060 Blower
23. Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56 Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS vs ASUS Radeon RX Vega 56
24. Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
25. Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS ASUS ROG Strix LC GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Phantom GS vs ASUS ROG Strix LC GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter