Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs. ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
-VS-
ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GA104-300-A1 GPU Chip TU106
46 Execution units 36
5888 Shader 2304
96 Render Output Units 64
184 Texture Units 144
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.410 GHz
1.845 GHz Boost Clock 1.650 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.62 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
270 W TDP 175 W
-- TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Radial
3 x 90 mm Fan 1 1 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
42-44 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 2x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports 1
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Addressable LED LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
304 mm Length 268 mm
136 mm Height 113 mm
60 mm Width --
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
NE63070H19P2-1040G Part-no TURBO-RTX2070-8G
Q4/2020 Release date Q4/2018
689 $ Release price --
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
2. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 StormX OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC Palit GeForce RTX 3060 StormX OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
3. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GameRock OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GameRock OC
4. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX (1-Click OC) vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
5. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC 16G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC 16G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
6. Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GP OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GP OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
7. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Vulcan OC-V Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Vulcan OC-V
8. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC ASRock Radeon RX 6800 Phantom Gaming D 16G OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs ASRock Radeon RX 6800 Phantom Gaming D 16G OC
9. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC
10. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
11. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ARMOR OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ARMOR OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
12. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Windforce 11G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Windforce 11G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC
13. MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X vs ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070
14. ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 XC GAMING ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 XC GAMING
15. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT OC 4G ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT OC 4G vs ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070
16. ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Phoenix V1 ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Phoenix V1
17. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SUPRIM X 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SUPRIM X 8G
18. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock
19. Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Phantom GS V1 LHR ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Gainward GeForce RTX 3080 Phantom GS V1 LHR vs ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070
20. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS OCV1 Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS OCV1
21. ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 Ti X3 OC ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 Ti X3 OC
22. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G
23. ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 580 4G ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 580 4G
24. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro
25. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 U-TOP-8G-V ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 U-TOP-8G-V vs ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070


back to index
Facebook
Twitter