ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
Benchmark and Specs

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070

GPU

Based on: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU Chip: GA104-300-A1
Execution units: 46
Shader: 5888
Render Output Units: 96
Texture Units: 184

Memory

Memory Size: 8 GB
Memory Type: GDDR6
Memory Clock: 1.750 GHz
Memory Speed: 14 Gbps
Memory Bandwith: 448 GB/s
Memory Interface: 256 bit

Clock Speeds

Base Clock: 1.500 GHz
Boost Clock: 1.755 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
Avg (Game) Clock: 1.725 GHz
Overclocking: Yes

Thermal Design

TDP: 220 W
TDP (up): 250 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 4 %
Tjunction max: 93 °C
PCIe-Power: 2 x 8-Pin

Cooler & Fans

Fan-Type: Axial
Fan 1: 2 x 100 mm
Fan 2: --
Cooler-Type: Air cooling
Noise (Idle): 0 dB / Silent
Noise (Load): 43-45 dB

Connectivity

Max. Displays: 4
HDCP-Version: 2.3
HDMI Ports: 2x HDMI v2.1
DP Ports: 3x DP v1.4a
DVI Ports: --
VGA Ports: --
USB-C Ports: --

Featureset

Max. resolution: 7680x4320
DirectX: 12_2
Raytracing: Yes
DLSS / FSR: Yes
LED: ASUS Aura Sync

Supported Video Codecs

h264: Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC: Decode / Encode
VP8: Decode
VP9: Decode
AV1: Decode

Dimensions

Length: 267 mm
Height: 135 mm
Width: 52 mm
Width (Slots): 3 PCIe-Slots
Weight: --

Additional data

GPU Interface: PCIe 4.0 x 16
Release date: Q4/2020
Release price: 649 $
Structure size: 8 nm
Part-no: DUAL-RTX3070-8G
Documents: data sheet

Benchmark results

3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.
View all 3DMark Benchmark benchmark results



3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.
View all 3DMark Benchmark benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.
View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
144 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR
8 GB GDDR6
141 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
141 fps (avg)
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
139 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
11 GB GDDR6
138 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6
122 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti LHR
8 GB GDDR6
122 fps (avg)
View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.
View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).
View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti LHR
8 GB GDDR6
92 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
92 fps (avg)
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
91 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
8 GB GDDR6
91 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
8 GB GDDR6
85 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon VII AMD Radeon VII
16 GB HBM2
81 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (Mobile) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (Mobile)
16 GB GDDR6
80 fps (avg)
View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).
AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6
155 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
11 GB GDDR6
145 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR
8 GB GDDR6
144 fps (avg)
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
144 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
143 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6
138 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
129 fps (avg)
View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.
View all Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.
View all Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.
View all Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.
View all Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.

View all FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) benchmark results




Recommended power supplies for this graphics card

Power Supply PCIe 8 Pin (6+2) Release price



Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
5. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
6. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
7. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
10. EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
11. Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
12. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
13. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
15. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
18. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
19. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
20. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
21. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin X2 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin X2 OC
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G
24. PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6600 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6600 XT vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)


back to index
Facebook
Twitter