GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
Benchmark and Specs

GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
GPU
Based on: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU Chip: Navi 21 XT
Execution units: 72
Shader: 4608
Render Output Units: 128
Texture Units: 288
Memory
Memory Size: 16 GB
Memory Type: GDDR6
Memory Speed: 2 GHz
Memory Bandwith: 512 GB/s
Memory Interface: 256 bit
Clock Speeds
Base Clock: 1.825 GHz
Boost Clock: 2.310 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 3 %
Avg (Game) Clock: 2.065 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
Overclocking: Yes
Thermal Design
TDP: 300 W
TDP (up): 345 W
Tjunction max: 96 °C
PCIe-Power: 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Fan-Type: Axial
Fan 1: 2 x 115 mm
Fan 2: 1 x 100 mm
Cooler-Type: Air cooling
Noise (Idle): 0 dB / Silent
Noise (Load): 35 dB
Connectivity
Max. Displays: 4
HDCP-Version: 2.3
HDMI Ports: 2x HDMI v2.1
DP Ports: 2x DP v1.4a
DVI Ports: --
VGA Ports: --
USB-C Ports: --

Featureset
Max. resolution: 7680x4320
DirectX: 12_2
Raytracing: Yes
DLSS / FSR: No
LED: GIGABYTE RGB Fusion
Supported Video Codecs
h264: Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC: Decode / Encode
VP8: Decode / Encode
VP9: Decode / Encode
AV1: Decode
Dimensions
Length: 324 mm
Height: 140 mm
Width: 60 mm
Width (Slots): 3 PCIe-Slots
Weight: --
Additional data
GPU Interface: PCIe 4.0 x 16
Release date: Q1/2021
Release price: 779 $
Structure size: 7 nm
Part-no: GV-R68XTAORUS M-16GD
Documents: data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.

View all FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) benchmark results



3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.

View all 3DMark Benchmark benchmark results



3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.

View all 3DMark Benchmark benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 EAGLE 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 EAGLE 24G
24 GB GDDR6X
199 fps (avg)
Amazon
Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro OC Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro OC
24 GB GDDR6X
199 fps (avg)
Amazon
GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
16 GB GDDR6
198 fps (avg)
Amazon
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
16 GB GDDR6
198 fps (avg)
Amazon
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio 16G MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio 16G
16 GB GDDR6
198 fps (avg)
Amazon
View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

View all Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

View all Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

View all Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

View all Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results





Popular comparisons

1. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
2. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 FTW3 GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 FTW3 vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
3. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1 GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1
4. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080
5. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition
6. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO 10G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO 10G
7. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock
8. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
9. XFX Radeon RX 5700 Triple Dissipation GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G XFX Radeon RX 5700 Triple Dissipation vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
10. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G
11. ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
12. ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 XT OC GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5700 XT OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
13. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 MASTER 16G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 MASTER 16G vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
14. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT OC GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT OC
15. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Ventus 11G OC GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Ventus 11G OC
16. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC LHR GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
17. MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio 16G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio 16G vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
18. PowerColor Hellhound Spectral White Radeon RX 6700 XT GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G PowerColor Hellhound Spectral White Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
19. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti EX (1-Click OC) GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G KFA2 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti EX (1-Click OC) vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
20. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC
21. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Advanced GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Advanced vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
22. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT
23. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC (GDDR6) GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC (GDDR6) vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
24. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master Type C 16G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master Type C 16G vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G
25. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT SE GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master 16G vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT SE


back to index
Facebook
Twitter