GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
Benchmark and Specs

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
GPU Memory
Based on: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Memory Size: 16 GB
GPU Chip: Navi 21 Memory Type: GDDR6
Execution units: 80 Memory Speed: 2 GHz
Shader: 5120 Memory Bandwith: 512 GB/s
Render Output Units: 128 Memory Interface: 256 bit
Texture Units: 320
Clock Speeds Thermal Design
Base Clock: 1.875 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 3 % TDP: 340 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 13 %
Boost Clock: 2.285 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 % TDP (up): 390 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 13 %
Avg (Game) Clock: 2.050 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 % Tjunction max: --
Overclocking: Yes PCIe-Power: 3 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Fan-Type: Axial Cooler-Type: Air cooling
Fan 1: 3 x 85 mm Noise (Idle): 0 dB / Silent
Fan 2: -- Noise (Load): 36-37 dB
Connectivity Featureset
Max. Displays: 4 Max. resolution: 7680x4320
HDCP-Version: 2.3 DirectX: 12_2
HDMI Ports: 2x HDMI v2.1 Raytracing: Yes
DP Ports: 2x DP v1.4a DLSS / FSR: No
DVI Ports: -- LED: GIGABYTE RGB Fusion
VGA Ports: --
USB-C Ports: --
Supported Video Codecs
h264: Decode / Encode VP8: Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC: Decode / Encode VP9: Decode / Encode
AV1: Decode
Dimensions Additional data
Length: 286 mm GPU Interface: PCIe 4.0 x 16
Height: 118 mm Release date: Q4/2020
Width: 58 mm Release price: 1,049 $
Width (Slots): 3 PCIe-Slots Structure size: 7 nm
Weight: -- Part-no: GV-R69XTGAMING OC-16GD
Documents: data sheet


Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.






Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT
2. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
3. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming
4. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC
5. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING OC 24G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING OC 24G
6. EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 BLACK GAMING GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 BLACK GAMING vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
7. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming X Trio 16G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming X Trio 16G
8. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming OC 10G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming OC 10G
9. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
10. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
11. EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC BLACK GAMING GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC BLACK GAMING vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
12. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
13. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G MSI GeForce RTX 2070 ARMOR 8G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs MSI GeForce RTX 2070 ARMOR 8G
14. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme Waterforce WB 10G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme Waterforce WB 10G vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
15. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 EAGLE OC 24G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 EAGLE OC 24G
16. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX (1-Click OC)
17. PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
18. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Edge OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Edge OC vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
19. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G MSI Radeon VII 16G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs MSI Radeon VII 16G
20. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 GAMING GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 GAMING
21. EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 Ultra Gaming LHR GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 Ultra Gaming LHR vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
22. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus OC vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
23. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
24. ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G
25. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming OC 16G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter