Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
Benchmark and Specs

Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition

GPU

Based on: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU Chip: Navi 21
Execution units: 80
Shader: 5120
Render Output Units: 128
Texture Units: 320

Memory

Memory Size: 16 GB
Memory Type: GDDR6
Memory Clock: 2.000 GHz
Memory Speed: 16 Gbps
Memory Bandwith: 512 GB/s
Memory Interface: 256 bit

Clock Speeds

Base Clock: 1.825 GHz
Boost Clock: 2.730 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 21 %
Avg (Game) Clock: 2.375 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 18 %
Overclocking: Yes

Thermal Design

TDP: 430 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 43 %
TDP (up): --
Tjunction max: --
PCIe-Power: 1 x 6-Pin, 2 x 8-Pin

Cooler & Fans

Fan-Type: Axial
Fan 1: 3 x 120 mm
Fan 2: 1 x 90 mm
Cooler-Type: AIO water cooling
Noise (Idle): 0 dB / Silent
Noise (Load): --

Connectivity

Max. Displays: 4
HDCP-Version: 2.3
HDMI Ports: 1x HDMI v2.1
DP Ports: 3x DP v1.4a
DVI Ports: --
VGA Ports: --
USB-C Ports: --

Featureset

Max. resolution: 7680x4320
DirectX: 12_2
Raytracing: Yes
DLSS / FSR: No
LED: Addressable LED

Supported Video Codecs

h264: Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC: Decode / Encode
VP8: Decode / Encode
VP9: Decode / Encode
AV1: Decode

Dimensions

Length: 270 mm
Height: 130 mm
Width: 45 mm
Width (Slots): 3 PCIe-Slots
Weight: 1148 g

Additional data

GPU Interface: PCIe 4.0 x 16
Release date: Q1/2021
Release price: 1,499 $
Structure size: 7 nm
Part-no: 11308-08-20G
Documents: data sheet

Benchmark results

3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.
View all 3DMark Benchmark benchmark results



3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.
View all 3DMark Benchmark benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
24 GB GDDR6X
128 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6
122 fps (avg)
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
16 GB GDDR6
118 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X
116 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
16 GB GDDR6
114 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X
114 fps (avg)
View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.
View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.
View all Battlefield 5 benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).
View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X
152 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6
152 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12GB
12 GB GDDR6X
151 fps (avg)
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
16 GB GDDR6
142 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
16 GB GDDR6
140 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 LHR
10 GB GDDR6X
139 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB GDDR6X
138 fps (avg)
View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6
207 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X
198 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X
195 fps (avg)
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
16 GB GDDR6
194 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
16 GB GDDR6
192 fps (avg)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12GB
12 GB GDDR6X
189 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
16 GB GDDR6
180 fps (avg)
View all Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.
View all Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.
View all Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.
View all Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.
View all Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) benchmark results



FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.

View all FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) benchmark results




Recommended power supplies for this graphics card

Power Supply PCIe 8 Pin (6+2) Release price



Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
2. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
3. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate
4. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition
5. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 KINGPIN HYBRID GAMING Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 KINGPIN HYBRID GAMING
6. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
7. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
8. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Radeon RX 6900 XT Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs Sapphire Radeon RX 6900 XT
9. ASRock Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Formula 16GB Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition ASRock Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Formula 16GB vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
10. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate
11. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
12. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE
13. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC
14. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition
15. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 GAMING Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 GAMING
16. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition ASUS ROG Strix LC GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix LC GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
17. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 KINGPIN HYDRO COPPER GAMING Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 KINGPIN HYDRO COPPER GAMING
18. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G OC Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G OC vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
19. GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 HOF Premium Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 HOF Premium vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
20. ASUS Radeon VII Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition ASUS Radeon VII vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
21. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
22. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 MINI ITX OC 6G (rev 1.0) Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 MINI ITX OC 6G (rev 1.0)
23. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA HYDRO COPPER GAMING Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA HYDRO COPPER GAMING
24. GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 SG (1-Click OC) Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 SG (1-Click OC) vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition
25. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC 6G Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC 6G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter