AMD Radeon Pro W7900
vs
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
GPU comparison with benchmarksThe AMD Radeon Pro W7900 is based on the AMD Radeon Pro W7900 (RDNA 3) and has 48 GB GDDR6 graphics memory with a bandwidth of 864 GB/s.
The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada is based on the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada (Ada Lovelace) and has 48 GB GDDR6 graphics memory with a bandwidth of 960 GB/s. |
||
GPUThe AMD Radeon Pro W7900 has the Navi 31 graphics chip installed, which is based on the RDNA 3 architecture. The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada is based on the graphics chip AD102, which comes from the Ada Lovelace architecture. |
||
| AMD Radeon Pro W7900 | GPU | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada |
| AMD Radeon Pro W7900 | Based on | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada |
| Navi 31 | GPU Chip | AD102 |
| RDNA 3 | Architecture | Ada Lovelace |
| 96 | Streaming Multiprocessors | 142 |
| 6144 | Shader | 18176 |
| 192 | Render Output Units | 192 |
| 384 | Texture Units | 568 |
| 96 | Raytracing Cores | 142 |
MemoryThe graphics memory of the AMD Radeon Pro W7900 clocks at 2.250 GHz, which corresponds to a speed of 18.0 Gbps. The graphics memory speed of the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada is 20.0 Gbps and the clock speed is 2.500 GHz. |
||
| 48 GB | Memory Size | 48 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 2.250 GHz | Memory Clock | 2.500 GHz |
| 18.0 Gbps | Memory Speed | 20.0 Gbps |
| 864 GB/s | Memory bandwidth | 960 GB/s |
| 384 bit | Memory Interface | 384 bit |
Clock SpeedsThe clock frequency of a graphics card determines the speed in connection with the graphics architecture. |
||
| 1.855 GHz | Base Clock | 2.175 GHz |
| 2.495 GHz | Boost Clock | 2.535 GHz |
| Avg (Game) Clock | ||
| Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
Thermal DesignThe AMD Radeon Pro W7900 is powered by 2 x 8-Pin connectors. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the graphics card is 295 W. The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada has 1 x 16-Pin PCIe power connectors that supply it with energy. The manufacturer specifies the TDP of the card as 300 W (Reference). |
||
| 295 W | TDP | 300 W (Reference) |
| -- | TDP (up) | -- |
| 99 °C | Tjunction max | 93 °C |
| 2 x 8-Pin | PCIe-Power | 1 x 16-Pin |
Cooler & FansThe AMD Radeon Pro W7900 is equipped with a total of 1 Radial main fans. The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada has 1 Radial main fans that cool the GPU and memory. |
||
| Radial | Fan-Type | Radial |
| 1 x 75 mm | Fan 1 | 1 x 70 mm |
| -- | Fan 2 | -- |
| Air cooling | Cooler-Type | Air cooling |
| 0 dB | Noise (Idle) | 0 dB |
| -- | Noise (Load) | -- |
ConnectivityUp to 4 screens can be operated with the AMD Radeon Pro W7900. The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada supports the operation of a maximum of 4 monitors. |
||
| 4 | Max. Displays | 4 |
| 2.3 | HDCP-Version | 2.3 |
| -- | HDMI Ports | -- |
| 4x DP v2.1 | DP Ports | 4x DP v1.4a |
| -- | DVI Ports | -- |
| -- | VGA Ports | -- |
| -- | USB-C Ports | -- |
FeaturesetWith the AMD Radeon Pro W7900 it is possible to operate a screen with a maximum resolution of up to 7680x4320 pixels. The maximum supported resolution of the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada is 7680x4320 pixels. |
||
| 7680x4320 | Max. resolution | 7680x4320 |
| 12_2 (Ultimate) | DirectX | 12_2 (Ultimate) |
| Yes | Raytracing | Yes |
| Yes | DLSS / FSR | Yes |
| No LED lighting | LED | No LED lighting |
Supported Video CodecsThe support and acceleration of certain video codecs can have a positive impact on the lower energy consumption and less waste heat from the graphics card. |
||
| Decode / Encode | h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | h265 / HEVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | AV1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | VP8 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | VP9 | Decode |
DimensionsThe AMD Radeon Pro W7900 is connected to the system via PCIe 4.0 x 16 lanes and requires 3 PCIe-Slots space in the housing. The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada needs the space of 2 PCIe-Slots in the case and has a PCIe 4.0 x 16 Lanes interface. |
||
| 280 mm | Length | 267 mm |
| 110 mm | Height | 112 mm |
| 51 mm | Width | -- |
| 3 PCIe-Slots | Width (Slots) | 2 PCIe-Slots |
| -- | Weight | -- |
| PCIe 4.0 x 16 | GPU Interface | PCIe 4.0 x 16 |
| No | SFF-Ready | No |
Additional dataThe AMD Radeon Pro W7900 has been manufactured with a structure width of 5 nanometers since Q2/2023. The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada came on the market in Q1/2023 and will have a structure width of 5 nanometers manufactured. |
||
| -- | Part-no | -- |
| Q2/2023 | Release date | Q1/2023 |
| 3,999 $ | Launch Price | 6,799 $ (Reference) |
| 5 nm | Structure size | 5 nm |
| data sheet | Documents | data sheet |
1.855 GHz, 48 GB (295 W TDP)
Buy this graphic card at amazon!
2.175 GHz, 48 GB (-- TDP)
Buy this graphic card at amazon!
Rate these graphics cards now
Benchmark results
3DMark Benchmark (DirectX, Raytracing)
3DMark is a benchmark program that determines the performance of certain components of a computer and then reports the performance as a numerical value.
Time Spy Extreme Graphics score
|
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
Port Royal (Raytracing)
|
|
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
Speed Way Graphics Score (Raytracing)
|
|
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 was developed by CD Projekt Red and is based on the development studio's own REDengine 4. Ray tracing is switched off in our benchmarks.
3840x2160 (2160p)
|
|
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a visually stunning game that is ideal as a graphics card benchmark. We test the game with maximum details on Windows 10.
1920x1080 (1080p)
|
|
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL, Vulkan, Metal)
Geekbench 6 is a cross-platform benchmark for main processors, which also carries out 3 different graphics benchmarks and outputs them in the form of a numerical value.
Geekbench 6 - OpenCL
|
|
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
Geekbench 6 - Vulkan
|
|
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second.
FP32 (TFLOPS)
|
AMD Radeon Pro W7900
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
|
|
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
48 GB GDDR6 |
||
Popular comparisons
